A Degree of Insecurity?

As I was wending my (rail)way back across the country I was struck by signs on Wolverhampton station identifying it as the home of Wolverhampton University.  One wonders where else people would expect to find Wolverhampton University, if not in Wolverhampton?  Other university towns I passed through did not feel the same need to emphasise that their eponymous university was sited as would be expected.

Cambridge station does mention that Cambridge is home to Anglia Ruskin University (but makes no mention of the much older institution of higher education with which it shares the city), but this does seem to offer information which is not entirely obvious.

Perhaps the signage reflects insecurity on the part of the burghers of Wolverhampton: they want to make clear that their city boasts a university.  I think I’d boast about being the site of the UK’s first automatic traffic lights (which does make me wonder if there were older, manual traffic lights elsewhere?) or the birth place of “Iron Mad” Wilkinson – but each to their own.

There is (at least) one thing which links the universities mentioned on Wolverhampton and Cambridge stations – they’ve both been through quite a few names over the years (rather like British Leyland and Sellafield).  WU is on its fourth name since the “Wolverhampton Mechanics’ Institute” was formed in 1835 (though only the seriously mature traveller would still be seeking the WMI), while ARU which started life as the Cambridge School of Art back in the 1850s is now on its fifth name. Perhaps the railways are being used as an attempt to strengthen the current “brand identity”.  I’ll need to visit more “university” towns to see if my theory of nomenclature evolution holds more generally – it should be easy enough to contrive a trip through Hatfield…


2 thoughts on “A Degree of Insecurity?

  1. matathew says:

    Your words educate, inform, entertain and delight, as ever. You didn’t mention Warwick University in the discussion, which seems to be so-named purely for branding purposes. As an entry on the university website puts it: Warning. University of Warwick is not in Warwick (though it is in the county Warwick or Warwickshire). In reality, it is (essentially) in Coventry. (But there is also a University of Coventry, which is different and in a different part of Coventry.) But at least it (Warwick University) has so far, I believe, stuck with the same name throughout its existence.

  2. Stuart Ffoulkes says:

    Interestingly, the Warwick “brand” does not only apply to the university. I have visited two electricity companies both of whom claim to be sited in Warwick though neither actually is, nor are they particularly close to each other (or the university for that matter). In at least one case, the company seemed to be embarrassed to be associated with Coventry.

    And don’t get me started on Dionne…

Feel free to continue the lunacy...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s